Only one this week - Harlequins v Wakefield on Saturday afternoon at 3pm.
In play liquidity is practically nil so unless you are following the match, you probably won't have many in play trading opportunities.
Those of you who followed my thoughts last year became aware of my "home fallacy" theory. Basically, I considered that the market greatly overrated home teams.
I think it might be back.
Now, it is very early to say, and Week One is usually a leveller, and obviously I am relying on paper squads, and team news is not out yet, but I am simply astonished that Wakefield are the outsiders at Harlequins.
Now, I am much higher on Wakefield and much lower on Quins than the bookies are in general, but when you consider that Quins will be without their captain Rob Purdham, and scrum half Luke Dorn, and I just wonder how they are favourites.
Anyone see something I'm missing? I'd price Wakefield 1.75 conservatively at a neutral venue. (Would be lower but for the fact it is Week 1) and even a 10% swing for the ground makes them favourites.
Finally, Wakefield are traditionally a fast starting side who fade as the season goes on. John Kear tends to have a heavy pre season to get his players in match shape before the start of the season and the Quins have only had one friendly I believe, and that was against London Skolars?
Update: I've just seen the Quins possible line up and dear god it is very poor. (They'll probably win now, RL can be a random game but I don't get the price at all.) Starting to worry what I am missing because this looks weird.
In play liquidity is practically nil so unless you are following the match, you probably won't have many in play trading opportunities.
Those of you who followed my thoughts last year became aware of my "home fallacy" theory. Basically, I considered that the market greatly overrated home teams.
I think it might be back.
Now, it is very early to say, and Week One is usually a leveller, and obviously I am relying on paper squads, and team news is not out yet, but I am simply astonished that Wakefield are the outsiders at Harlequins.
Now, I am much higher on Wakefield and much lower on Quins than the bookies are in general, but when you consider that Quins will be without their captain Rob Purdham, and scrum half Luke Dorn, and I just wonder how they are favourites.
Anyone see something I'm missing? I'd price Wakefield 1.75 conservatively at a neutral venue. (Would be lower but for the fact it is Week 1) and even a 10% swing for the ground makes them favourites.
Finally, Wakefield are traditionally a fast starting side who fade as the season goes on. John Kear tends to have a heavy pre season to get his players in match shape before the start of the season and the Quins have only had one friendly I believe, and that was against London Skolars?
Update: I've just seen the Quins possible line up and dear god it is very poor. (They'll probably win now, RL can be a random game but I don't get the price at all.) Starting to worry what I am missing because this looks weird.
Comment