If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Just scanning the IP prices for this arvo's racing now and I see that NATIVE RULER was done at the minimum 1.01.
Unlike some of the other results in the past few days, his conqueror DANDINO was also matched at the maximum 1000.
Given that the Timeform in-play prices are usually based upon a minimum £100 matched, this would go down as the biggest shock of the week.
I reckon the commentators played their part - Simon Holt definitely called Native Ruler as the winner ("Great training performance by Henry Cecil... etc) and the bookies' feed also went with the wrong result initially.
That said, the first price I saw on the photo was 1.15 Dandino - so fingers were burnt during the race as opposed to upon the close finish.
sometimes i do it too...
when i'm winning, i often "drop away" a 100 euros lay at 1.01 just for fun of in-play gambling. sooner or later i'll win one
anyway i know that in the long term the result will be +100-100-commission = i'll lose 5 euros of commission every 10.000 euros of bets
Has anyone been matched in-running at high odds and won?I don't no why people back at odds such as 1.01 etc it just doesn't make any sense especially if you have been stung by it in the past its just crazy.
Has anyone been matched in-running at high odds and won?I don't no why people back at odds such as 1.01 etc it just doesn't make any sense especially if you have been stung by it in the past its just crazy.
Don't worry about the 1.01 bettors, the pro ones make plenty. Don't assume their winning bets are only matched at 1.01, they can afford to take a hit now and then.
Has anyone been matched in-running at high odds and won?I don't no why people back at odds such as 1.01 etc it just doesn't make any sense especially if you have been stung by it in the past its just crazy.
Yes,I have.
If you watch at the end of the races,especially over 2m4f ,if it comes to a two horse battle,just watch the lay prices being offered for the horse that has a little chance to win.
It seems that the prices do not represent the real odds...
Has anyone been matched in-running at high odds and won?I don't no why people back at odds such as 1.01 etc it just doesn't make any sense especially if you have been stung by it in the past its just crazy.
i once went to back at around 3.50 but got matched at 15's then price hit 1.75 instantly in the run in.. was a happy day.
Also a few months ago, one of AP Mcoys rides hit 1000 at the final hurdle and was matched for £300 odd pounds it went on and won in the final run in,
i remember a similar thing happened to me: after i hedged for a profit pre-race, i kept "playing" in-race with minimum stake of 2 euro.
i backed at 100 but got matched at 900, i was sure the horse can't win anymore and immediately layed it again.
if i didn't lay it to save a minimum stake, now i'd be richer of 1800
Comment