Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: maths question

  1. #1
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    167
    Thanks: 9
    Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts

    Default maths question

    ok...

    im trying to find a way of laying 3 goals exactly on betfair..

    anyone got any ideas?

    so far iv come up with LAY 2.5 goals & lay 3.5 goals? would anyone be able to help me get a rough idea of what price id be laying the 3 goals exactly if i did this..

    very confusing i know..

  2. #2
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    159
    Thanks: 1
    Thanked 46 Times in 42 Posts

    Default

    the way im thinking you can do it on total goals market,but the odds will be the same as 2.5 give or take a point or 2.
    cheers
    terry.

  3. #3
    Australian Cultural Attaché
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,798
    Thanks: 546
    Thanked 1,250 Times in 610 Posts

    Default

    Will have a go.
    AFAIK the only ways to get 3 goals in a game of soccer, are:
    0-3
    1-2
    2-1
    3-0

    Now if you were to bet on each of those, you would have what you wanted.
    Lay them all, and you have layed 3 goals being scored. 4 bets as opposed to 2, but you are also only paying commission now on 1 market, instead of 2, so you are best off here.

    Now here are the odds for Blackburn vs Blackpool, for the scores in order, taking what is available:
    140
    21
    10.5
    23

    That represents .714%, 4.76%, 9.52%, 4.35% of the market, or a total of 19.35%, or odds of ~$5.169....

    Or, if you like, if you layed them:
    $7.14
    $47.62
    $95.24
    $43.48
    and 3 goals happened, your liability would be 806.52 for a potential gain of 193.48 if it didn't happen. 806.52/193.48 = 4.1685, plus your stake, gives you the same odds of ~5.169 as I stated before.

    In regards to laying over 2.5 and laying under 3.5, I will have a look later at how to calculate that but at this stage I don't see why I should bother when the most efficient way to do what you are asking is to use the correct score market as commission only comes out once then.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Temujin For This Useful Post:
    joneyyy1981 (14th March 2011), TheEvilCapitalist (28th March 2011)
  5. #4
    Australian Cultural Attaché
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,798
    Thanks: 546
    Thanked 1,250 Times in 610 Posts

    Default

    Now the other way, as stated in the post before mine, is to go to total goals market.
    3+ goals is represented by about 1.68
    4+ goals is represented by about 2.60
    Problem here is this market has 0 liquidity, but should still go close.

    Now, 1.68 is 59.52% market share, 2.60 is around 38.46% market share, a difference of about 21% which is around the chance of 3 goals exactly happening. I said 19.35%, this shows around 21.06%, in a non liquid environment.

    Back 3+, lay 4+, job done.

    But once again, just go to correct score market, much easier. Dutch all the possible selections. Dutch?



    Market share :
    = 1/ odds.............

    Dutching to exact profit :
    = target liability point (eg if you want to bet to return 100, 1000, or whatever)
    So:
    = 100 * (1/odds)

    If you bet to return a figure, no matter how many selections you take in the event, you will always return the same amount of money on a win, and always lose the same on a loss, because you are combining your bets as a total market share.
    eg.
    You dutch 2 10.00 selections. Each of them has a 10% market share. You bet 10 dollars on each, to represent betting to 100. Your total bet is 20 dollars, because you have effectively bet on 20% of the market, so you will always be betting 20 to win 80, so the chance of your bet happening is 5.00, or 20%.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Temujin For This Useful Post:
    joneyyy1981 (14th March 2011)
  7. #5
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    167
    Thanks: 9
    Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts

    Default

    thanks tem...

    yeah the correct score does seem the best way iv found, iv done a couple of games and i seem to be able to lay around 3.88 after %.

    i think anyways.

    take the man utd game tonight

    0-3 - 280 @ £3.35p = liability of £737.50
    1-2 - 32 @ £29.28p = liabilty of £736.96
    2-1 - 9.6 @ £97.58p = liability of £736.77
    3-0 - 13.5 @ £69.39 = liabilty of £736.77

    total = £200 profit £190 after %.

    737.5 divide by 190 = 3.88

    is this correct?

    i think if i shopped about on some of the prices i could get it lower..

  8. #6
    Forum Addict Wednesday 13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Montenegro
    Posts
    331
    Thanks: 229
    Thanked 359 Times in 169 Posts

    Default

    Looks correct to me - I calculated liabilities up to 1 unit difference to your ones, and profit 199.60 before commission.

    I used a simple Excel that simulates Correct Score market, which may help you with these calculations; enter your odds and stake in appropriate column ("Lay odds" and "Lay stake") and commission level, and you'll get the figures above; it's here: www.gubbed.me , the one titled "Correct Score market".

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wednesday 13 For This Useful Post:
    joneyyy1981 (15th March 2011), Temujin (15th March 2011)
  10. #7
    Australian Cultural Attaché
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,798
    Thanks: 546
    Thanked 1,250 Times in 610 Posts

    Default

    Well, depending on if you wish to use the commission figure in regards to the odds. Generally, I just use the base odds figure, and know that commission is coming off that.

    But you need to add your stake to it.

    Your %s add up to 21.32%, or 100/21.32 = 4.69.
    737/ 200 = 3.685, which adds up to the 4.69 if you add the stake....

    And obviously this figure is lower than yours, because you are laying (explaining to myself, as I was a little confused at first until I remembered LAY... )

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Temujin For This Useful Post:
    joneyyy1981 (15th March 2011)
  12. #8
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    167
    Thanks: 9
    Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts

    Default

    thanks guys, tam i get lost when you say add your stake..? makes it 4.69.?? so what odds am i REALLY laying? 3.685 or 4.69? if its 3.6 im good with that, if not im buggered?

  13. #9
    Director of Automated Solutions 1/4 of a millionaire fund's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,034
    Thanks: 118
    Thanked 897 Times in 450 Posts

    Default

    Treat everything much the same as you would dutching and convert things to a probability.

    So 2/1 fractional odds 3 decimal odds becomes 33.33% (100/3) 4/1 becomes 20% (100/(4+1)) etc

    You then just combine those probabilities to get your overall odds

    So laying the following decimal odds

    8, 8, 9 would become 12.5% + 12.5% + 11.11% = 36.11%

    to convert that probability back to odds we just divide by 100 which gives use odds of 2.77 (100/36.11)

    Like temujin said in your example the odds would end up at 4.69 (3.69/1 fractional odds)

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to 1/4 of a millionaire fund For This Useful Post:
    joneyyy1981 (15th March 2011)
  15. #10
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    167
    Thanks: 9
    Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts

    Default

    im still lost by the 4.69 / 3.69 ... which is it 3 or 4?

  16. #11
    Forum Addict Wednesday 13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Montenegro
    Posts
    331
    Thanks: 229
    Thanked 359 Times in 169 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joneyyy1981 View Post
    im still lost by the 4.69 / 3.69 ... which is it 3 or 4?
    You're risking 737 units to win 200 units; total payout is 937 units; therefore, you lay at odds of 937 / 200 = 4.69 in decimal format; that is, 3.69/1 in fractional format.

    Equivalent back odds are 4.69/3.69 = 1.27; therefore, it's the same as you backed "NO 3 goals" with stake of 737 units; your profit is 27% of your stake.

    (Of course, "NO 3 goals" market does not exist; it's just hypothetic to show you profit/loss ratio)

  17. #12
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    167
    Thanks: 9
    Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wednesday 13 View Post
    total payout is 937 units
    i thaught the payout was £737.5o, like it showed on the what if??? thats what confused me..

  18. #13
    Australian Cultural Attaché
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,798
    Thanks: 546
    Thanked 1,250 Times in 610 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joneyyy1981 View Post
    thanks guys, tam i get lost when you say add your stake..? makes it 4.69.?? so what odds am i REALLY laying? 3.685 or 4.69? if its 3.6 im good with that, if not im buggered?
    I think it has been well explained, but here is another go.

    If you lay at 5.00, for 100, your liability is only 400, because 1.00 of the odds is your stake.
    So using your calc, 400/100 gives you odds of 4.00, which is not accurate. Your stake must be included.

    Fractional odds, 4/1 represents 4 of their money, 1 of yours. You risk 1 backing, to make 4 off them, the kitty is 5 which is what the decimal odds represents, the kitty.

  19. #14
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    167
    Thanks: 9
    Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts

    Default

    iv got it into my very small brain i think now...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Talented Mavericks Limited
26 Buttercup Close
Corby
Northants
England
NN18 8LB

UK Company # 04872848
UK VAT # 887366268

Facebook TwitterYouTube



Betfair    Betdaq    VISA  Mastercard  American Express  Dinners Club  Discover  PayPal  Skrill